Open Beta β€” Everything is free while we test.

First assessment 2027

IB Psychology 2027 β€” The Full Journey

The 2027 syllabus is built around a single journey: from foundational concepts and real-world contexts, through your own research proposal (IA), to the final written assessments. Everything connects. This page shows you how.

1

The 6 Concepts

The lens through which all psychology is examined

Every topic in the 2027 syllabus is viewed through six overarching concepts. They are not separate chapters β€” they are recurring themes that appear in every context, every assessment, and every discussion. Mastering them early gives you a transferable vocabulary for the whole course.

How they connect: The six concepts are not independent β€” they overlap and reinforce each other. For example, Bias affects Measurement; Causality shapes how we interpret Change; and Responsibility underpins every discussion of Perspective. Practise linking them in your essays.
2

The 4 Contexts

Where psychology is applied

The four contexts replace the old "options" system. All students study all four contexts β€” there is no choice. Each context is examined in Paper 2, and the concepts from Step 1 are applied within each one.

How they connect: The four contexts are not siloed β€” the same theories appear across multiple contexts. For example, Social Learning Theory appears in both Human Development (how children learn behaviour) and Human Relationships (how group norms spread). Recognising these overlaps helps you revise more efficiently.
3

Internal Assessment (IA)

Your own research proposal

Word count
2,000–2,200
Marks
24 marks
SL weight
30%
HL weight
20%

The IA is a written research proposal on a topic of interest. You must justify your design choices, describe your procedure, and discuss ethical considerations. It is teacher-marked and moderated by the IB. Unlike the exams, it rewards careful planning and precise academic writing over time β€” not performance under pressure.

Prep strategy: Choose a topic that is well-researched and has identifiable gaps. Structure your proposal clearly: Introduction (theory + aim) β†’ Method (design, participants, procedure, ethics) β†’ Expected results. Cite correctly.

Go to IA Guide
How it connects: The IA draws on the same research methods knowledge tested in Paper 2A and Paper 3. Students who understand experimental design, ethics, and validity for the IA are better prepared for those exam sections β€” and vice versa.
4

Final Assessments

Papers 1, 2, and 3 (HL only)

Paper 1
1h 30 min Β· 35 marks
SL 35% Β· HL 25%
  • Section A β€” 2 Γ— 4-mark knowledge questions
  • Section B β€” 2 Γ— 6-mark application questions
  • Section C β€” 1 Γ— 15-mark Concepts in Context essay
Paper 1 Guide
Paper 2
1h 30 min Β· 35 marks
SL 35% Β· HL 25%
  • Section A β€” 20 marks across 4 contexts
  • Section B β€” 1 Γ— 15-mark extended response
Paper 2 Guide
Paper 3 (HL only)
1h 45 min Β· 30 marks
HL 30%
  • Unseen study stimulus
  • Questions on research methods, validity, and ethics
  • Requires interpreting data and critiquing claims
Paper 3 Guide
See full Assessment Overview (marks, weights, skills)

Skills Matrix

Many skills transfer across components. Use this matrix to identify where your revision has the highest cross-component return β€” a skill marked as core in multiple columns is worth prioritising early.

Core skill
Partially relevant
Not directly tested
SkillP1AP1BP1CP2A
Memorising key studies & findings
Defining & explaining concepts
Applying theory to a scenario
Evaluating strengths & limitations
Research methods knowledge
Critiquing an unseen study
Validity & credibility of claims
Academic / proposal writing
Ethical considerations