Paper 2 — Section B
Concepts in Unseen Study — think like a skeptical psychologist.
How to Approach an Unseen Study
The key skill Paper 2B tests is critical engagement — not just describing what the study did, but interrogating why it might be flawed, limited, or ethically complex. Think like a skeptical psychologist.
Self-Question Toolkit by Concept
Concept Interactions — High-Band Move
The markscheme explicitly rewards students who show how concepts link to each other.
| Interaction | Example |
|---|---|
| Measurement→Causality | Poor operationalization weakens internal validity |
| Bias→Responsibility | Cultural/gender assumptions raise ethical concerns |
| Bias→Measurement | Researcher assumptions reduce objectivity of measurement |
| Responsibility→Causality | Ethical constraints (e.g., can't fully deceive) limit experimental control |
Quick Checklist Before You Write
1
Have I named the concept clearly?
2
Have I explained what the concept means in general?
3
Have I applied it specifically to this study (with direct references)?
4
Have I evaluated — what does this limitation mean for the study's conclusions?
5
Have I linked it to another concept where possible?
6
Does my conclusion follow logically from my arguments?